Main Contents

Bush: ‘Lies My Neocon Friends Told Me’

Bush: 'Lies My Neocon Friends Told Me', Neocon Jews & The Afghan Surge

BUSH:
‘Lies My Neocon Friends Told Me’

By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008-2011

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Source: List Of Bush Administration Lies @ Rense.com Here


GEORGE BUSH’S NEOCON FRIENDS sold him a pack of lies. And Bush mouthed their lies making it a matter of public record.

The neocon lies gave Bush the impetus to invade Iraq in March 2003. The Zionist neocons had long been planning an Iraqi invasion to help their client – the State of Israel. Now it appears that Bush’s angle in the Iraqi invasion was all about oil.

The Zionist neocons who urged Bush to invade Iraq were members of the Project For The New American Century (PNAC). This group was led by the Zionist Jew William Kristol.

Kristol’s fellow Zionist Jews promoting the Iraqi lies were Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Feith, Richard Perle, Robert Kagan, Randy Scheunemann, Louis “Scooter” Libby, & Zionist sympathizers’ Donald Rumsfeld & Dick Cheney.

THE NEOCON LIES USED TO INVADE IRAQ

The Zionist neocon group PNAC set up as their ‘lead witness’ the Iraqi exile and former deputy prime minister of Iraq, Ahmed Chalabi.

Chalabi became known as “the neocon darling.”

In the run up to the 2003 Iraqi invasion, the neocons had Chalabi trot out an ‘Iraqi defector’ to whom the neocons gave the code-name “Curveball.” He was later exposed as an alcoholic & conman. “Curveball” told Americans about Saddam Hussein’s so-called “Weapons Of Mass Destruction” now proven to have been non-existent.

Bush finally was forced to admit the Zionist lie of the WMD. And the UN stated that the evidence supporting Iraq’s biological weapons were forged documents.

“Neocon darling” Chalabi also arranged interviews with “Saddam’s Mistress,” Parisoula Lampsos, who peddled lies about meetings between Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. These “meetings” provided more lies for the neocons to feed Bush who was itching to attack Iraq.

In March of 2008 it came to light that Senator John McCain was one of the first patrons of Chalabi’s grand-sounding International Committee for a Free Iraq.

And the recent discovery that Chalabi arranged meetings with the Iraqi oil minister for American oilmen like Bush fundraiser Albert Huddleston serves to prove that Bush was conspiring with US oil barons. For in 2006 Bush began touting the line: “We are in Iraq to keep the oil fields away from terrorists.”

In Other Words :
For The Neocons The Iraqi Invasion Is About A War For The Jews.
But For George Bush … It’s All About Oil.
___________________________________

For More See: “Iraq: A War For The Jews? Interviews!” Click Here

And: “The War On Terror Is A Jewish Hoax” Click Here


CLICK: Brother Nathanael…Street Evangelist!

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Brother Nathanael @ July 6, 2008

34 Comments

  1. admin July 6, 2008 @ 11:55 am

    Thanks Ed for another very insigtful comment.

    Is Judeofacism.com @ http://www.judeofascism.com/ your site? I thought it was Libertarian today. Or both?
    +BN

  2. America, the Beautiful July 6, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

    Ed, along the lines of an Orwellian 1984 “secular” controlling elite (in pursuit of world domination) . . I have noticed a disturbing trend in the way religion in general is characterized by the neocon media.

    Whether discussing Islam, Christianity, or Mormonism . . . “religion” is portrayed to be an ‘extremism’ in society. Not only is it portrayed as an extremism, it sure seems they try their best to get the most ‘oddball’ occurrences of religion and tout them on the mainstream media as “normal” religion.

    It is obvious they are trying to paint people of Faith as oddballs or illiterates.

    Look at the prominence that the Da Vinci Code was given as far as media interviews and documentaries.

    Portraying our Beloved Jesus Christ, Lord and Savior, with the imperfections of a mere mortal man . .given to lust, lying and covert behaviour.

    The whole cloth lying and deceit that took place to propagate such a blasphemous film could have only been done by those in service to Satan — the father of lies.

    As the days grow darker spiritually, look for more and more of this type of “advertising” on neocon controlled media.

    Has anyone noticed just how bold they have been of late in that they do not even try to curb their disgust for Christianity and our Lord Jesus.

    And yet, just like the ‘silent voices’ screaming during the primaries to give Ron Paul a chance (he would have taken the majority vote if treated fairly). . .they wisk away any opportunity for the masses to protest fairly on T.V.

    Silent screams in protest to our goverment take over, silent screams by aborted infants, silent screams by millions upon millions of Americans to give us back our country —- NONE of it is heard or acknowledged by the socio-fascists neocons in their quest for world domination.

    How long will we allow them to silence us?

    “They came for the poor man, but I was not poor, so I did not help.

    They came for the lame man, but I was not lame, so I did not help.

    They came for the Christian, but I was not a Christian so I did not help.

    They came for the Muslim, but I was not Muslim, so I did not help.

    When they came for me, there was no one left to help me.”

    NOW — is the time to stop them from degrading our most sacred doctrines of Christianity. Now is the time to respond.

    Vote these secularists and their poisonous ideas out of office.

  3. james July 6, 2008 @ 3:30 pm

    @Ed

    You forgot to mention that they are also against the most pro-christian nation on earth Russia under the leadership of Vladimir Putin although most Europeans and Americans share the same Jewish view on Russia.

    Interesting to see the Serb disporia in Europe over the Kosovo independence crisis holding Russia and VPutin placards rather than any of there own leaders. Read an interesting article published in 2004 by Srdja Trifkovic http://educate-yourself.org/cn/georgesorospostmodernvillian31aug04.shtml that George Soros was deeply invoved in destroying Russias economy during the 90’s linked in BN’s previous post http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=201.

    I think people talk way to much about the Palestinians. I want to hear about the Judiao/russian mafia, jewish sex crimes, financial scams and crimes, etc.

  4. Greg July 6, 2008 @ 4:46 pm

    Read some scientific literature sometime. I cannot believe the lies and deceptions that pass off as evidence for things like evolution and natural selection. In computer science one would never get by with the nonsense being peddled by the scientific community, who are only chess pieces being used by the elite against the dumbed down American populace. One can find vague statements throughout scientific literature like “might have been”, “could possibly have been”, etc… Even the stupid claims that macro evolution is now the same as tons of micro evolutionary changes is one that I tear them apart for teaching in our classrooms these days. I grabbed a collegiate level dictionary and looked up the meaning to “macro” and it says the opposite of micro. And yet these zionists continue to dumb down what is being taught and they preach nonsense about where the universe got its origins from and where humans came from. I wish so many Americans were not so dumbed down and complacent on what is being fed to them by the zionists who claim they can explain the universe without having God at the point of origin.

    Has anyone ever wondered why scientists claim the big bang created the universe as we see it yet the same big bang would have not been able to create space that the universe is supposedly been expanding into without having fully expanded into that space in the moments after the big bang. There is no such thing as space being created through the big bang but yet matter and energy not being able to occupy that space shortly after the bang occurred. And yet people all over believe such craziness. If space was created by the big bang then the universe could not be expanding anymore, as the original effect of the bang would have filled the space that the big bang had created or else space didn’t get created by the big bang.

  5. Greg July 6, 2008 @ 5:08 pm

    In addition, one would have a very hard time ever finding another time in human history when leaders have violated the very constitutions and treaties upon which their governments were based upon. The zionists have violated every agreement they have ever made on a national and world level, thus they are international criminals and should be treated as such. In 1948 the leaders in the zionist camp made a deal with the world and middle east nations in the Israeli Declaration of Independence. One can see how they are violating this 1948 agreement on a wide scale today. Here is a link to the agreement that the zionists made with the rest of the world in regards to establishing the state of Israel:

    http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/israel.htm

    What I find particularly amusing is this section that it being violated many times each day by the zionist leaders:

    “THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”

    Now given that Israel has rarely ever complied with United Nations mandates and laws voted on by the member nations over the last 50 plus years, how dare they sit there and play bully with using western military forces to get what they want with the Arab neighbors in regards to denying the other nations in the region the ability to defend itself against the WMD that Israel possesses.

  6. james July 6, 2008 @ 5:35 pm

    Is it true in Israel that settlers are allowed to carry machine guns?

    Seeing how in the US jewish senators are behind tougher arms controls.

  7. Greg July 6, 2008 @ 5:56 pm

    Israel is the single nation that stands in violation of the highest number of United Nations resolutions even though the leaders promised the world community in 1948 that they would obey and be faithful to the princples of the Charter of the United Nations.

    Still wondering why “They hate us”?

    International law does not matter for Israel because they are a US client state. Israel has yet to comply with ANY of the resolutions.

    Zionists will argue that the UN is just anti-semetic and that neither international law nor UN resolutions apply ..but ..uh it is the UN and international bodies which gave them most of the very land they occupy today! (1948) Which is it? UN is either relevant or it is not.

    A list of UN Resolutions against “Israel” 1955-1992:

    Resolution 106: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid”.

    Resolution 111: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people”.

    Resolution 127: ” . . . ‘recommends’ Israel suspends it’s ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem”.

    Resolution 162: ” . . . ‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions”.

    Resolution 171: ” . . . determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria”.

    Resolution 228: ” . . . ‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control”.

    Resolution 237: ” . . . ‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees”.

    Resolution 248: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan”.

    Resolution 250: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem”.

    Resolution 251: ” . . . ‘deeply deplores’ Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250″.

    Resolution 252: ” . . . ‘declares invalid’ Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital”.

    Resolution 256: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as ‘flagrant violation”.

    Resolution 259: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation”.

    Resolution 262: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport”.

    Resolution 265: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan”.

    Resolution 267: ” . . . ‘censures’ Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem”.

    Resolution 270: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon”.

    Resolution 271: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem”.

    Resolution 279: ” . . . ‘demands’ withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon”.

    Resolution 280: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon”.

    Resolution 285: ” . . . ‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon”.

    Resolution 298: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem”.

    Resolution 313: ” . . . ‘demands’ that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon”.

    Resolution 316: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon”.

    Resolution 317: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon”.

    Resolution 332: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon”.

    Resolution 337: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty”.

    Resolution 347: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon”.

    Resolution 425: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon”.

    Resolution 427: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon.

    Resolution 444: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces”.

    Resolution 446: ” . . . ‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ‘serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”.

    Resolution 450: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon”.

    Resolution 452: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories”.

    Resolution 465: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel’s settlements program”.

    Resolution 467: ” . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon”.

    Resolution 468: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return”.

    Resolution 469: ” . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the council’s order not to deport Palestinians”.

    Resolution 471: ” . . . ‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”.

    Resolution 476: ” . . . ‘reiterates’ that Israel’s claim to Jerusalem are ‘null and void'”.

    Resolution 478: ” . . . ‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law'”.

    Resolution 484: ” . . . ‘declares it imperative’ that Israel re- admit two deported Palestinian mayors”.

    Resolution 487: ” . . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s nuclear facility”.

    Resolution 497: ” . . . ‘decides’ that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith”.

    Resolution 498: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon”.

    Resolution 501: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops”.

    Resolution 509: ” . . . ‘demands’ that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon”.

    Resolution 515: ” . . . ‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in”.

    Resolution 517: ” . . . ‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon”.

    Resolution 518: ” . . . ‘demands’ that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon”.

    Resolution 520: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut”.

    Resolution 573: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.

    Resolution 587: ” . . . ‘takes note’ of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw”.

    Resolution 592: ” . . . ‘strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops”.

    Resolution 605: ” . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.

    Resolution 607: ” . . . ‘calls’ on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

    Resolution 608: ” . . . ‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians”.

    Resolution 636: ” . . . ‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.

    Resolution 641: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians.

    Resolution 672: ” . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for violence against Palestinians at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

    Resolution 673: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.

    Resolution 681: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.

    Resolution 694: ” . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.

    Resolution 726: ” . . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians.

    Resolution 799: “. . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for there immediate return.

  8. Greg July 6, 2008 @ 6:06 pm

    My last posting on this subject thread is this one. There are two particular UN resolutions and agreements that Israel has failed to comply with regarding its own nuclear weapons. They are the UNGA Res 48/71 Nuclear Weapon Free Zone In The Middle East and UNGA Res 48/78 – Israeli Nuclear Armanent which were both made by the UN General Assembly in 1993. Israel is more than aware that they are not in compliance with most UN resolutions that were part of their 1948 agreement to enter into the world community as a Israeli state. Here is the list of UN resolutions from their own Israeli Ministry Of Foreign Affairs government website.

    http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign+Relations/Israel+and+the+UN/Selected+resolutions/

    The 48/71 and the 48/78 General UN Assembly resolutions can be read at the above link.

  9. Dave July 6, 2008 @ 7:23 pm

    I personally believe that while Israel currently justifies its possession of WMDs for self-preservation against their neighbours (which they truly despise and wish to hegemonize), they will use this nuclear arsenal to force the world’s hand at accepting a Satanic one-world government based out of Jerusalem after WWIII (which BTW is currently being fomented)……since there will no longer be any true world powers remaining.

  10. angel of the south July 6, 2008 @ 9:43 pm

    James

    I don’t think the Jews relinquished control of Russia after the dissolution of the USSR. I think the Jewish financial and industrial oligarcy, and the Federation of Jewish Communities presided over by Jewish diamond magnate Lev Leviev, stil have enough clout to get what the Jews want done in the Russian Federation today.

    I personally think the hype in the Russian Federation’s Constitution about the new regime’s desire “to preserve the historically established state unity of Russia, revere the memory of the ancestors who conveyed love for the motherland, and to revive the sovereign statehood of Russia, etc,” is Jew contrived propaganda, to conceal the Jews’ power and evil intent behnd the scenes.

    I notice that the Jew Dimitry Medevdev has been recently appointed Putin’s successor as President of the Russian Federation. I don’t think Russia is the most pro-Christian nation today; I think America still is, but as we know she’s losing ground to the Jews that control her fast.

  11. admin July 6, 2008 @ 9:53 pm

    Dear Angel of the South,

    Medvedev is NOT a Jew. He has denied this and I have the proof of it which I will post soon.

    Medvedev is a professed Orthodox Christian. So even IF he had some Jewish ancestry, (which he does not), he could not be called a “Jew” any longer.

    The Moscow Patriarchate acknowledges Medvedev as a “baptized Christian.”

    Once again, you cannot support your assertions dear Angel – but continue to throw out information that is only heresay.

    I was raised as a Jew by two Jewish parents. But I am now an Orthodox Christian and identify as such. But to racists which you appear to be, I am labeled a “Jew.”

    But the Lord Jesus Christ has got me down in His book, (not yours thank God) as a “Christian.” +BN

  12. Lynda July 7, 2008 @ 12:38 am

    Dear Br Nathanael,

    I think you have fielded this one correctly.

    The Masonic Revolution brewing in North America against the Zionist Occupied Government is white supremacist and is using the Credo as a mere ideology, garnering support from Christian people who love their country and who most sincerely hold to some doctrines of the faith.

    Lacking a foundation in the Church, however, they do not have the formation to perceive that the Credo can not be reduced and utilized as a revolutionary ideology.

    This is not to say that Christians under their bishops and duly constituted national authorities have not taken up arms. They have. The Vendee, for example, for their King took up arms against the masonic revolutionaries of France. The Cristeros, took up arms against the masons in Mexico which overthrew their Catholic nation. Franco, Moreno many, many examples.

    White supremacism, masonic counter revolutions and payback and pogroms, however, are not really Christian causes.

    The Masonic republic of America has only ever granted freedom to religions. Under the Constitution, Satanism has as much right as the Christian Zionists or the Baptists.There was never a constitutional recognition of the Church. And the window of opportunity to win America for the Christian faith as a nation is closing.

    In fact, the only thing they all agree on their opposition to the Catholic Church. It has always been o.k. in America to be an anti-Catholic bigot.

    The Evangel of the Church is to all nations including Jewry, including the Khazars. The opposition to the Synagogue has been there from day one but it is not the raison d’etre of the Church. It just goes with the turf.

    The mission of the Church is to offer the Evangel and baptism to all nations that they as nations be built up on the foundation of the order that our Lord has laid down.

    The Church proclaims that our Lord Jesus Christ has dethroned Lucifer. It is finished. But those who are baptised into his victorious death must assert that victory against the principalities and powers (the archons) who rule this age of the world seated in wickedness. Therefore, the Church opposes the Synagogue because the Church elevates the Kingship of Christ.

    This is the focus. And I think the Russian Constitution reflects this focus for the Russian Patriarchate.

    It would be very interesting to hear the Angel of the South give an account of his focus. I know. You know. But the uninitiated should hear this. Because this is the apocalypse. The hidden things are now being shouted from the housetops.

    Or as Michael Hoffman would say – Revelation of Method.

    So Angel of the South. Let’s hear it from you – what exactly is your truth against the world? Y gwyr yn erbyn y byd.

    The masonic counter-revolution brewing in the U.S.of A – you are pretty deep into the counsels of it. Aren’t you.

  13. Bill July 7, 2008 @ 6:04 am

    Lynda

    Zionism and Masonry are one and the same, the Masonic New World order is exactly the same as the Zionist New World Order, they are not in opposition vying for control over the rest of us mere mortals. Some Christians are indeed drawn towards Nationalism, or White Supremacism as you seem to wish to call it (Interestingly the ADL calls it white supremecy too), this is a natural reaction to the Internationalim/Globalsm being promoted by the Zionists and Masons.

  14. Ed July 7, 2008 @ 9:25 am

    “Is Judeofacism.com @ http://www.judeofascism.com/ your site? I thought it was Libertarian today. Or both?”

    Yes, Br. Nate, they are both kin.

  15. james July 7, 2008 @ 9:31 am

    @angel of the south

    Russia is the most pro christian nation on earth and the US is the most anti christan unfortunate to say. The US supports and sponsers muslims or christians throughout the 90’s to the present they support the Kosovars over the Serbs, Chechens over Russians and Azeris over Armenians. Christian

    The maainstream media doesn’t portray Putin as a patriot but as authoritarian and a facist.

    Putin is very smart he realises the mistakes of Czar Nicholas II and alligned himself to have good relations with the jewish community while mentaining control over his country and promoting the resturation of Russias spiritual and religious heritage

    Medvedevv ran Gzsprom the anti-Yukos/Rothschild oil company so I doubt that he represents Jewish interests.

  16. james July 7, 2008 @ 9:50 am

    Actually I made a mistake in my previous post (besides the spelling mistakes) the UK is actually the most anti-christain country, its virtually a marxist state.

    I forgot to mention a good website I discovered http://www.rusjournal.com/. It has good revealing info about the Ukraine 2004 elections, who the pro western president actually is or was, the fatima prophecy, freemasonry, orthodox theolgy, etc.

    The orthodox discussions I dont understand maybe Brother Nathanial or Lynda would have a better foreknowledge of this.

  17. America, the Beautiful July 7, 2008 @ 10:27 am

    james, hi — I clicked on the link you provided and read the article regarding the conversion of Russia (the fatima prophesy).

    Here’s what I gather from the article:

    It seems the author is overly concerned about the fact that, in his view, people seem to be confusing the necessity of recognizing Russian Orthodoxy vs. the ills of Communism.

    He keeps harping on the fact that Russia was no longer “Russia” after the revolution of 1917 — therefore, let’s not say “Russia” needs to be converted . . . because the Soviet Union was communistic.

    Here is what I would tell the priest who wrote the article:

    The Blessed Mother appeared to three simple shepherd children who happened to be Roman Catholic. She gave them a prophesy and expected them to relay it to their Roman Catholic bishop. It was a prophesy to be understood by Catholics and given to the world as a warning against the “errors of Russia”.

    The world, for the most part, interpreted that to be Communism, not Russian Orthodoxy.

    Communism has “errors” because it is anti-Christian and basically promotes an anti-christian agenda.

    Even a simple-minded Roman Catholic like me can figure that one out.

    As the Scriptures state, “God has revealed to children what he has kept hidden from the learned and the clever.”

    So again, in reference to the article written, it is not necessary that one understand Russian literature, or Russian Orthodox theology or the complex nature of political rebellions and replacement goverments.

    We must only love Jesus with our whole mind, heart and soul.

    God protects children and fools . . . so I will be okay.

  18. admin July 7, 2008 @ 10:46 am

    Dear Angel of the South –

    Your last comment which is now gone had a ‘racial slur’ on my behalf.

    You are pushing the envelope dear one. Be careful. +BN

  19. Ed July 7, 2008 @ 11:47 am

    There are many false Gods, most of which come in the form of ideologies. Racialism is one of those, and not coincidentally, racialism is an entrenched characteristic of Zionism. (This is ironic in that, being descendants of the Khazars, the Ashkenazi Jews who wrote the book on Zionism and the racial litmus test for Israeli citizenship have no bloodline ties to the Semitic Israelites of historic Palestine whatsoever). This just goes to show that the racialist ideological construct is primarily psychological. This is not to say that there are no innate differences between the races, or heritable characteristics, but building an ideology around racialism is a false path, because on its face it excludes the potential contribution that all of God’s children can make to humanity and civilization. Whether right-wing or left-wing, institutional racialism (and I include affirmative action programs as an example of left-wing institutional racialism) is an explicit rejection of the Christian ethos. In fact, racialism in all its forms may well be designed by its enemies to frustrate, confuse and undermine Christianity.

  20. Greg July 7, 2008 @ 1:05 pm

    That is so true Ed. Over 10 years ago I started writing letters to the editor about the classism involved with affirmative action policies. At that time, many people read my letters and thought that I didn’t know what I was saying, but now I hear from these same folks and they understand the classist nature of minority class demographic politics. I have always believed in the idea that we are all children of God, thus we should only be judged in life based upon what we have done or not done, a standard of merit. Otherwise people who don’t work as hard have no incentive to work hard if they get the rewards that should be going to those who have chosen to work harder and develop the talents that God has given to them. And at no time did the government ever classify the poor of all races and genders as being a minority worthy of more opportunities in this nation. But the zionists hated those who stood for not compromising the Christian values by which our nation was based, so they attacked them through policies of affirmative action that hates the white men who had no earthly status in the government or business sector. The way to remove Christianity from the culture the fastest was by defunding and stealing from those who best defended the Christian faith, which was the main goal of affirmative action policies. But as scripture says “whatsoever a person has sown in this lifetime, they eventually will have to reap either eternal rewards or eternal punishment for having done.” I would never trade all the money in the world to be sitting in the place where the souls of these zionists are now resting. They are in direct opposition to God and His will, which has damaging eternal consequences to being in such a position.

  21. Sonia July 7, 2008 @ 5:03 pm

    I am coming from I may say the other side (where the communism flurished) and as much respect I have for this site for the good disection of what is going around us and in the world. I also would like to warn you westerners, I do not trust the political situation neither in my country nor in Russia. I know that our people are orthodox christians and russians are also but it does not mean that Putin should be put in the piedestal you put him on. Russia is used still to confront the west by the power that are behind the world order and Putin needs to defend his and Russian exsistance and this is OK by all means. However, About his christianity I am scpetical many of the communists now for expediancy and public relations attend the orthodox church in our countries. I hope I am wrong but my gut feelings are telling me otherwise we will see, time will tell soon. May the Lord, Jesus Christ keep us in his hands and give us wisdom to understand.
    God Bless you brother Nathaniel! Keep up the great work!

  22. james July 7, 2008 @ 5:28 pm

    @America, the Beautiful

    Did you read the link where he responds to a letter submitted by a student of Russian literature asking about causes for the revolution and writings on the wall of the Ipatiev house were the royal family was slaughtered?

    The reply suggests a possible jewish occult angle. It also covers the social and political make up of pre-revolutionary Russia.

    Hers a link to the article http://www.rusjournal.com/question1206.html

    Heres the link to the website that features the mysterious writings on the walls of the Ipatiev House http://www.romanov-memorial.com/Cellar_Room.htm

    If anyone has a clue as to what the symbols might represent it would be good to hear your comments

    Brother Nathanial you might have some insight if it has some jewish connotations?

  23. Bill July 7, 2008 @ 6:04 pm

    Ed

    Who are the biggest promoters of Multiculturalism in the US ? the ADL of course.

    Why ? to undermine traditional Christian values and break down society.

    Who supported the Muslims against the Serbs (Christian Nationalists) ? Zionists of course.

    Why ? they can’t allow a Christian Nationalist country in Europe.

    The list is endless but I will stop there. As a Christian I oppose every aspect of Zionist policy including Globalisation (Free movement of Capital, and LABOUR). Now no doubt the ADL will call me a racist or a white Supremacist for that stance, but I will not accept the name as I do not hold any grudge or malice against any other race, I have just come to the realisation that Multicultaralism is being used as a tool to destroy the Christian Nations of Europe and North America.

  24. America, the Beautiful July 7, 2008 @ 6:06 pm

    james,

    Very interesting information about the Russian royal family and their murders via occultic scripts. It does not surprise me. Afterall, Satan rejects the Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ and ALL of Christendom.

    I am not a history scholar by any stretch of the imagination, but I would love to hear Brother Nathanael’s analysis of the links that you have provided.

    The Good News is that Jesus wins in the End, as the Book of Revelations proclaims so triumphantly!

    Amen and Alleluia!

  25. james July 7, 2008 @ 6:15 pm

    @Sonia

    What country are you from?

    It has been well publisized that Putin was a former KGB colonel and the media make contant references to this.

    But after WW2 the new communists states were not installed with Russian communists but ethnic jewish communists groups that comprised the newly formed comunist states after WW2. The Baltic states, Hungry Poland, etc. This was exactly the original goal of internationalist Bolshevik occupation of Russia to overthrough the Czarist government using it as a base and proxy to spread communism acroos the globe.

  26. james July 7, 2008 @ 6:19 pm

    @America, the Beautiful

    Yes, I would love to hear Brother Nathanael’s analysis of the wrings as well.

  27. Bulletinman July 7, 2008 @ 7:05 pm

    When will the American people wake up and realize that our country is totally beholden to the Zionist? God Bless you Brother for telling the truth.

  28. jon July 7, 2008 @ 9:21 pm

    BN, check this out.

    http://tinyurl.com/5bwhna

    “A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to this promotional video found at the Lamperd Less Lethal website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers.

    This bracelet would:

    • take the place of an airline boarding pass

    • contain personal information about the traveler

    • be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

    • shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes

    The Electronic ID Bracelet, as it’s referred to as, would be worn by every traveler “until they disembark the flight at their destination.” Yes, you read that correctly. Every airline passenger would be tracked by a government-funded GPS, containing personal, private and confidential information, and that it would shock the customer worse than an electronic dog collar if he/she got out of line …”

  29. admin July 7, 2008 @ 9:55 pm

    Thanks jon –

    I’m probably going to do a special report on this soon – with some great pics! +bn

  30. Ern(e)st July 9, 2008 @ 1:19 am

    Hitler has been elected with 39 % of the votes and Bush with 49 %….

    After his “election”, Hitler burned down the parliament house (the Reichstag) by his “communists” and replaced it by the Kroll Opera House in Berlin! Bush did not need to do the same. In fact, the US have ceased long ago to be a democracy…. an the Capitol was already a theater before! And Bush let his “terrorists” do other important crimes for him and his friends.

    In fact, no matter how many votes for Obama or for McCain will be counted. Neither of them will act on behalf of the Americans. A much more democratic alternative would have been the choice between the outstanding Ralph Nader and the excellent Pat Buchanan.

    And something else:
    Be careful, in a few years (if not already the case!) China will be more powerful than the USA. This will be the (last) moment for the USA of making war to this rival. In a way, it will be like the beginning of WW1 when Great Britain decided that France, Russia, Italy and finally the USA should defeat his potentiel rival Germany. However, the British did it in a clever way. They let other nations bear most of the burden and with the help of Serbian terrorists they forced Austria-Hungary and Germany to open the war. But the American “strategists” of today are so stupid. They only think in terms of war related technological superiority. I am very pessimistic.

    And one more remark:
    In my opinion the most horrible political crime of the 20th centrury was the destruction of Germany and Austria-Hungary by the “Allied Nations”. The dismantling of these nationas without any democratic legimitation and consultation of the people concerned led directly to communism and to national-socialism…..and to the madness of “US world domination”. Have a look at the situation of (formerly cheered) Yugoslavia/Serbia today and of the (formerly appreciated) USA in the next 10 years! It makes me think that there is somewhere a Superior Justice, beyond the influence of human beeings.

    An observer from Old Europe.
    Ernst

    (Sorry for my poor English/American. I am a native Swiss and German and French speaker)

  31. sadiq September 16, 2008 @ 2:42 pm

    The zionist crimes have occured, then u started realizing.I sympathize with you. I am 100% satisfied that”war on terror” is hoax (courtesy : rense..com).This hoax war is presently being rubbed upon the “indian subcontinent”. Brothers, is there preventive way of enlightening the people in advance?

  32. canadian injun ern October 8, 2008 @ 7:26 pm

    these zionist use the holocaust as a shield for all the evil they have and are doing in isreal – worldwide. if you bring up entire palestine townships that have been flattened and resettled by thieving euro-convert jews whos “HOMELAND” is europe. theyll blast you for supporting terrorism and being a ANTI-SEMITIC” racist who doesnt remember WW2. its the most effective use of the racecard in history! what really blows me away is the people using it are white people! jews in faith not semitic in race at all? as a canadian native race member i am a obvious convert and believe palestine is the holyland but not gonna go claim it as my “HOMELAND” and forcefully uproot the families already there,turn them into refugees in thier actual “HOMELAND” and then have the gall to call the resistance movement TERRORISTS. the zionists are pure evil and think the son of god false a prophet,yet we’re obliged to them cuz they got slaughtered,BULL hello every race/nation has gotten it too! the control the media so public sentim

  33. Mike March 16, 2012 @ 3:02 pm

    Our criminals or politicians should be pursued by the 99%.

    There is control of the American or Jew. I hope.

  34. canilecanan August 6, 2015 @ 4:52 pm

    Most of the Americans and especially families of US soldiers were saying “the Iraq war aiming to bring democracy to those lands.”

    I was surprised to hear these type comments and thought they were all jokes. One American woman whose two sons were killed during Iraq war defended it will bring democracy to Iraq!

    Saddam was a bad man, but it got more worse after him.

    I still can’t understand why people make wars (“to bring democracy,” “for holiness,” “to make all the world Muslim,” “to fight in the name of Allah/God/Jesus” etc.) For many hundreds of years man fighting for such rubbish.

Leave a comment